My concern with it is that, while the expanding circle of concern is pretty important to me, it’s fairly philosophically opinionated in a way that I’m not sure is “future proof.” I wouldn’t be that surprised if in 20 years I found myself disagreeing with it’s frame in some way.
I think there are already reasons to disagree with its frame, as described in this gwern post.
I think there are already reasons to disagree with its frame, as described in this gwern post.