You should attack the bad links in the causal chain that lead to absurd conclusions, not the conclusions themselves.
So yes, it’s worth attacking the bible’s nonchalance about contradictions—but don’t bother dwelling on the contradictions themselves.
The contradictions are a proper point of attack, but only if they would be really, genuinely troublesome even granting the rest of the premises.
You should attack the bad links in the causal chain that lead to absurd conclusions, not the conclusions themselves.
So yes, it’s worth attacking the bible’s nonchalance about contradictions—but don’t bother dwelling on the contradictions themselves.
The contradictions are a proper point of attack, but only if they would be really, genuinely troublesome even granting the rest of the premises.