Shouldn’t the authors be aware of this? (I think one of them is even fairly well known in psychology circles.)
I am sure the authors are more informed about their work than anyone who has not read it.
I’m not sure what the correlation is between prominence and paper quality. At any rate, he-s a co-author; not the main author. Co-authors can sometimes have very little to do with the actual paper.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Shouldn’t the authors be aware of this? (I think one of them is even fairly well known in psychology circles.)
I am sure the authors are more informed about their work than anyone who has not read it.
I’m not sure what the correlation is between prominence and paper quality. At any rate, he-s a co-author; not the main author. Co-authors can sometimes have very little to do with the actual paper.