Sure, I just don’t expect that it did impact peoples’ models very much*. If I’m wrong, I hope this review or the other one will pull those people out of the woodwork to explain what they learned.
*Except about Leverage, maybe, but even there...did LW-as-a-community ever come to any kind of consensus on the Leverage questions? If Geoff comes to me and asks for money to support a research project he’s in charge of, is there a standard LW answer about whether or not I should give it to him? My sense is that the discussion fizzled out unresolved, at least on LW.
A non-obvious thing here: last year, Lightcone put a fair amount of effort into doing lots of interviews, orienting on the Leverage situation, and attempting to publish a blogpost that offered a pretty clear and comprehensive set of information. We were specifically thinking of this from the standpoint of “it doesn’t seem like there are very good community justice institutions or practices around, beyond random discussions”, and thinking maybe we could contribute something useful.
And then, well, a lot of stuff came up and we didn’t get the piece over the finish-line of publishing.
So I’m coming at this from the perspective, partly “how valuable would it have been to get that across the finish line?”. And I see both this piece and the Zoe piece as representing the collective situation.
I also do just agree some of the claims in this piece (implicit and explicit) that many of the cult-looking-behaviors of leverage are red herrings and are reasonable things I want to defend.
Sure, I just don’t expect that it did impact peoples’ models very much*. If I’m wrong, I hope this review or the other one will pull those people out of the woodwork to explain what they learned.
*Except about Leverage, maybe, but even there...did LW-as-a-community ever come to any kind of consensus on the Leverage questions? If Geoff comes to me and asks for money to support a research project he’s in charge of, is there a standard LW answer about whether or not I should give it to him? My sense is that the discussion fizzled out unresolved, at least on LW.
A non-obvious thing here: last year, Lightcone put a fair amount of effort into doing lots of interviews, orienting on the Leverage situation, and attempting to publish a blogpost that offered a pretty clear and comprehensive set of information. We were specifically thinking of this from the standpoint of “it doesn’t seem like there are very good community justice institutions or practices around, beyond random discussions”, and thinking maybe we could contribute something useful.
And then, well, a lot of stuff came up and we didn’t get the piece over the finish-line of publishing.
So I’m coming at this from the perspective, partly “how valuable would it have been to get that across the finish line?”. And I see both this piece and the Zoe piece as representing the collective situation.
I also do just agree some of the claims in this piece (implicit and explicit) that many of the cult-looking-behaviors of leverage are red herrings and are reasonable things I want to defend.
That post sounds useful, I would have liked to read it.