Questions (just yes or no)
1.) How many of you are in science fields? (by that I mean actually doing research, publishing papers etc.)
2.) How many of you have ever built an AI video game or other?
3.) How many of you have worked on or with or designed automated reasoning and or theorem proving software or algorithms?
4.) How many of you is this just a hobby?
I think those will do for now. (I am just curious from reading the post and comments which apparently someone didn’t like my observation in my other comment which was valid)
“No. You are arrogant, ill informed and condescending. Basically, a troll.”
Ok… fine, I am arrogant but thats because I am smarter then almost everyone here...(and I have the IQ, accomplishments… to prove it) I am condescending because most of you are just hobbiest trying to brown-nose your way into EY’s good graces.
Ill informed?
Hmmmm..… coming from people who can’t even identify a re-invention of the wheel when they see it or understand the opposition to make a cogent argument… fine… I take that as a compliment.
Trust me I am not a troll, just because I say things which you guys don’t like doesn’t make me a troll. If you want to find good examples of real trolls go to google groups...
Nevertheless not enough smart to get the orthography right. I don’t usually criticise typos, but your way of arguing calls for that.
Honestly, what effect do you expect from declaring that you are superior and able to prove it? This is clearly not the way how to win debates. That’s basically why people can think you are a troll.
Humor me: I want to take an informal poll:
Questions (just yes or no) 1.) How many of you are in science fields? (by that I mean actually doing research, publishing papers etc.)
2.) How many of you have ever built an AI video game or other?
3.) How many of you have worked on or with or designed automated reasoning and or theorem proving software or algorithms?
4.) How many of you is this just a hobby?
I think those will do for now. (I am just curious from reading the post and comments which apparently someone didn’t like my observation in my other comment which was valid)
No. You are arrogant, ill informed and condescending. Basically, a troll.
“No. You are arrogant, ill informed and condescending. Basically, a troll.”
Ok… fine, I am arrogant but thats because I am smarter then almost everyone here...(and I have the IQ, accomplishments… to prove it) I am condescending because most of you are just hobbiest trying to brown-nose your way into EY’s good graces.
Ill informed?
Hmmmm..… coming from people who can’t even identify a re-invention of the wheel when they see it or understand the opposition to make a cogent argument… fine… I take that as a compliment.
Trust me I am not a troll, just because I say things which you guys don’t like doesn’t make me a troll. If you want to find good examples of real trolls go to google groups...
Cheers
I am smarter then almost everyone here
you are just hobbiest
Nevertheless not enough smart to get the orthography right. I don’t usually criticise typos, but your way of arguing calls for that.
Honestly, what effect do you expect from declaring that you are superior and able to prove it? This is clearly not the way how to win debates. That’s basically why people can think you are a troll.
...strams fo tol a nekat evah tsum taht hctac ruoy no stargnoC .ekatsim a edam I ,tniop dooG
...uoy htiw dehsinif ma I kniht I neht tog ev’uoy tseb eht si taht fi oS