Not that it’s bad, for that would be confusing levels, even if “shit” were being used in its usual figurative sense. For example, I would consider some true things said that are self-harmful violations of social norms “shit.”
Like others I read it from a link on LW, I think...thanks for posting.
Quantity of experience: brain-duplication and degrees of consciousness Nick Bostrom
Wow, that is one nice Bostrom paper. Has its critique of Chalmers’s argument been discussed before on LW?
Do you mean to say that Aaronson’s paper is bad, or that everyone’s already read it?
Not that it’s bad, for that would be confusing levels, even if “shit” were being used in its usual figurative sense. For example, I would consider some true things said that are self-harmful violations of social norms “shit.”
Like others I read it from a link on LW, I think...thanks for posting.