The idea is to (say) show an erotic image on the right if the stock goes up, and one on the left if the stock goes down. It’s still porn precognition, except the “randomness” source is the stock market rather than whatever they used in the original experiment.
It does still assume though that the effect allows one to predict better than chance where the image will appear regardless of the process that determines the location.
Suppose humans had some sort of telepathy that allowed them to read the state of the computer on some subconscious level and thereby predict the location where the image would appear, if the location were determined by the computer that was displaying the images. Predicting corporate earning announcements, interest rate changes, etc. would be an entirely different matter.
No it doesn’t?
The idea is to (say) show an erotic image on the right if the stock goes up, and one on the left if the stock goes down. It’s still porn precognition, except the “randomness” source is the stock market rather than whatever they used in the original experiment.
Ah, you’re right, I misinterpreted that.
It does still assume though that the effect allows one to predict better than chance where the image will appear regardless of the process that determines the location.
Suppose humans had some sort of telepathy that allowed them to read the state of the computer on some subconscious level and thereby predict the location where the image would appear, if the location were determined by the computer that was displaying the images. Predicting corporate earning announcements, interest rate changes, etc. would be an entirely different matter.