Can you expand on what that has to do with your original comment? It seems that your original comment was substantially stronger than simply noting that being a student is not enough to understand education. If that’s what you mean that seems like a different (and weaker) claim than your initial comment.
Can you expand on what that has to do with your original comment? It seems that your original comment was substantially stronger than simply noting that being a student is not enough to understand education. If that’s what you mean that seems like a different (and weaker) claim than your initial comment.
The original comment said understanding MUCH about education. It was implicit that understanding much about something is necessary to fixing it.
Yes, but they didn’t say that their understanding came purely from being a student. So I’m not sure how the much is relevant.