With RNA/DNA vaccines, you are essentially programing a person to have a very specific immunological state. An immunity that is perfectly identical/reproducable between individuals vaccinated against the same sequence, resulting in a real homogenous kind of protection across the population.
That’s not true. Whether you inject someone a spike protein or let the cells of the person build the spike protein in both cases the body will try to build antibodies that bind the spike protein.
Geneticists know that DNA sequencers essentially do such barcoding at the individual fragment level as a required step of many sequencing protocols. It is extrodinarily unlikely—no, impossible—that those developing nucleotide-base vaccines wouldn’t have considered this possibility.
If you give an mRNA vaccine then there won’t be any new DNA in which you can hide DNA sequences and the RNA that you put in the cells is gone after a few days/weeks.
That’s not true. Whether you inject someone a spike protein or let the cells of the person build the spike protein in both cases the body will try to build antibodies that bind the spike protein.
If you give an mRNA vaccine then there won’t be any new DNA in which you can hide DNA sequences and the RNA that you put in the cells is gone after a few days/weeks.
Why do you think the DNA sequence couldn’t be different from batch to batch?