I have no idea, but I can take a guess. 1) Because crime scenes will have more information left in them. We can’t tell your age all that easily from a blood sample, but if your vaccinated with something suitable for your age range...
and 2) obviously being the spike protein being present on your cell surfaces is like an interacellular backdoor. But that isn’t my area of expertiese at all, just pure speculation on my part :)
If you want more information in crime scenes sequencing the DNA of population is much more effective. It tells you actually who the person is instead of just broad information about them.
In the UK the NHS has the goal to provide DNA testing to every newborn and as the technology progresses we will likely see more treatments that depend on information from DNA testings.
It’s much easier to explain to policemen who actually enforce the laws why the government has DNA information then explaining why the government secretly put barcodes into people and police loyality matters.
and 2) obviously being the spike protein being present on your cell surfaces is like an interacellular backdoor. But that isn’t my area of expertiese at all, just pure speculation on my part :)
The spike protein is only present for a short time (that’s why you need the booster shot).
We can’t tell your age all that easily from a blood sample
Also I suspect it’s easier and more accurate to directly get an age range from a blood sample by looking at things like NAD levels than to determine if the immune system reacts to a specific protein.
I still don’t think there’s enough motive for anyone to do this:
Because crime scenes will have more information left in them. We can’t tell your age all that easily from a blood sample, but if your vaccinated with something suitable for your age range...
For this to be useful, you’d have to:
Let the police and justice system in on the conspiracy, which makes it almost impossible to keep quiet
Somehow convince courts that this obviously-illegal data collection is admissable in court
Even if you do that, it’s unclear how useful it is for detectives to know that a blood sample came from someone who is or isn’t over 65 years old or someone who was probably a healthcare worker in January 2021.
And then you’ve only answered “Why would the police want this?” and not “Why would Moderna’s executive team volunteer to go to jail forever to make this happen?” Even if courts decide that allowing this as evidence is in the greater good, there’s no chance the people who made it happen will avoid going to prison for injecting millions of people with a non-FDA-approved drug. Why would they do that?
obviously being the spike protein being present on your cell surfaces is like an interacellular backdoor. But that isn’t my area of expertiese at all, just pure speculation on my part :)
I think the mRNA vaccines only provide the desired proteins for a short time, since they have no way to replicate themselves. I also don’t think making “the spike protein present on your cell surfaces” is an accurate description of what they do, but this is also not my area of expertise.
Even assume these did create a way to target biological warfare at people over 65 and/or people who were healthcare workers in January 2021, it’s again unclear to me why the founders of Moderna and everyone else who has studied the effects of this vaccine would be willing to go to prison forever to do that.
Nothing about what I described would be illegal, per se. It’s their vaccine, if they want small but specific change from batch to batch, i’m not sure that would be illegal. Police will probably use the immunological profile of suspects regardless of whether they are in on it or not. Intentional or not, this wasn’t a problem with previous kinds of vaccine.
Nothing about what I described would be illegal, per se. It’s their vaccine, if they want small but specific change from batch to batch, i’m not sure that would be illegal.
It’s illegal for Moderna to add slightly more vaccine than expected to a vial without permission from the FDA. I guarantee that changing the contents of the vaccine without telling anyone is illegal.
I have no idea, but I can take a guess. 1) Because crime scenes will have more information left in them. We can’t tell your age all that easily from a blood sample, but if your vaccinated with something suitable for your age range...
and 2) obviously being the spike protein being present on your cell surfaces is like an interacellular backdoor. But that isn’t my area of expertiese at all, just pure speculation on my part :)
If you want more information in crime scenes sequencing the DNA of population is much more effective. It tells you actually who the person is instead of just broad information about them.
In the UK the NHS has the goal to provide DNA testing to every newborn and as the technology progresses we will likely see more treatments that depend on information from DNA testings.
It’s much easier to explain to policemen who actually enforce the laws why the government has DNA information then explaining why the government secretly put barcodes into people and police loyality matters.
The spike protein is only present for a short time (that’s why you need the booster shot).
Also I suspect it’s easier and more accurate to directly get an age range from a blood sample by looking at things like NAD levels than to determine if the immune system reacts to a specific protein.
I still don’t think there’s enough motive for anyone to do this:
For this to be useful, you’d have to:
Let the police and justice system in on the conspiracy, which makes it almost impossible to keep quiet
Somehow convince courts that this obviously-illegal data collection is admissable in court
Even if you do that, it’s unclear how useful it is for detectives to know that a blood sample came from someone who is or isn’t over 65 years old or someone who was probably a healthcare worker in January 2021.
And then you’ve only answered “Why would the police want this?” and not “Why would Moderna’s executive team volunteer to go to jail forever to make this happen?” Even if courts decide that allowing this as evidence is in the greater good, there’s no chance the people who made it happen will avoid going to prison for injecting millions of people with a non-FDA-approved drug. Why would they do that?
I think the mRNA vaccines only provide the desired proteins for a short time, since they have no way to replicate themselves. I also don’t think making “the spike protein present on your cell surfaces” is an accurate description of what they do, but this is also not my area of expertise.
Even assume these did create a way to target biological warfare at people over 65 and/or people who were healthcare workers in January 2021, it’s again unclear to me why the founders of Moderna and everyone else who has studied the effects of this vaccine would be willing to go to prison forever to do that.
Nothing about what I described would be illegal, per se. It’s their vaccine, if they want small but specific change from batch to batch, i’m not sure that would be illegal. Police will probably use the immunological profile of suspects regardless of whether they are in on it or not. Intentional or not, this wasn’t a problem with previous kinds of vaccine.
It’s illegal for Moderna to add slightly more vaccine than expected to a vial without permission from the FDA. I guarantee that changing the contents of the vaccine without telling anyone is illegal.