I’m vaguely worried that this might be net-negative for ML in particular, if you’re worried about differential tech development.
The idea is that if the conference is run by people who are interested in safety, they can preferentially accept papers which are good from a differential technological development point of view.
I’m vaguely worried that this might be net-negative for ML in particular, if you’re worried about differential tech development.
The idea is that if the conference is run by people who are interested in safety, they can preferentially accept papers which are good from a differential technological development point of view.