Would it? There are some behaviors of single cells that can be adscribed to competition with other cells of the body, so there might be an intuitive sense in which they are mesa-optimizers. That’s the point behind of neural darwinism for example.
And those don’t always align with the interests of the ‘body’.
Good point. You can take the intentional stance with regards to cells pretty decently.
But mesa-optimizers have the connotation that they emerge within the optimized substrate as a consequence of outer optimization. I don’t think that narrative fits with cells and humans at all. Both humans and cells are mesaoptimizers implied by the genetic code, with evolution as the outer optimization process, but they don’t have that kind of inner/outer optimizer relationship to each other. If anything, humans are closer to being the mesaoptimizers of cells than vice versa.
No that would be silly :D
Would it? There are some behaviors of single cells that can be adscribed to competition with other cells of the body, so there might be an intuitive sense in which they are mesa-optimizers. That’s the point behind of neural darwinism for example.
And those don’t always align with the interests of the ‘body’.
Good point. You can take the intentional stance with regards to cells pretty decently.
But mesa-optimizers have the connotation that they emerge within the optimized substrate as a consequence of outer optimization. I don’t think that narrative fits with cells and humans at all. Both humans and cells are mesaoptimizers implied by the genetic code, with evolution as the outer optimization process, but they don’t have that kind of inner/outer optimizer relationship to each other. If anything, humans are closer to being the mesaoptimizers of cells than vice versa.