You have an interesting definition of “absolutely eviscerated.” MOB mostly just seems to be tossing teacher’s passwords like they were bladed frisbees.
You responded at DH0, which certainly didn’t help an already inflamed situation. That comment thread is what I was referring to, and also why I wrote “others’ multiple logical failures” to refer to Armondikov’s “it’s impossible until somebody builds it” argument.
Do you address the possibility of complex self-replicating proteins with complex behavior? It looks like the only thing addressed in the article is traditional robots scaled down to molecule size, and it (correctly) points out that that won’t work.
It won’t let me enter a number that says “Drexlerian MNT defies physics”. What’s the maximum number of years I can put in?
You were absolutely eviscerated in the comments there. Thanks for posting.
You have an interesting definition of “absolutely eviscerated.” MOB mostly just seems to be tossing teacher’s passwords like they were bladed frisbees.
I think MOB is justly frustrated with others’ multiple logical failures and DG’s complete unwillingness to engage.
I didn’t write the post, Armondikov (a postdoc chemist) did, and he engaged at length.
You responded at DH0, which certainly didn’t help an already inflamed situation. That comment thread is what I was referring to, and also why I wrote “others’ multiple logical failures” to refer to Armondikov’s “it’s impossible until somebody builds it” argument.
Do you address the possibility of complex self-replicating proteins with complex behavior? It looks like the only thing addressed in the article is traditional robots scaled down to molecule size, and it (correctly) points out that that won’t work.