First to be clear I have not closely read all the series or even this one completely—just feeling sick today so not focused. However, I did have a thought I wanted to get out. May have been well addressed already.
It seems that we are perhaps missing an element here. Is it possible that even if one is working, from a entire corporate structure setting, in a moral maze that various levels and don’t really impose the same problems. Thinking of this as a setting where we see the whole as one large pond. However, what if rather than one large pond what we have is actually a collection or connected smaller ponds and the maze really only applies in some and at the collection of ponds level.
Is there something of a fallacy of composition error potential here? The whole is a moral maze but many of the ponds it is comprised of lack that character?
If so then it may well be possible to escape the maze without having to quit the job.
First to be clear I have not closely read all the series or even this one completely—just feeling sick today so not focused. However, I did have a thought I wanted to get out. May have been well addressed already.
It seems that we are perhaps missing an element here. Is it possible that even if one is working, from a entire corporate structure setting, in a moral maze that various levels and don’t really impose the same problems. Thinking of this as a setting where we see the whole as one large pond. However, what if rather than one large pond what we have is actually a collection or connected smaller ponds and the maze really only applies in some and at the collection of ponds level.
Is there something of a fallacy of composition error potential here? The whole is a moral maze but many of the ponds it is comprised of lack that character?
If so then it may well be possible to escape the maze without having to quit the job.