I don’t agree that associating multiple related ideas is necessarily ‘not good’, that said Governance and politics are not the focus of this article. In fact it specifically addresses that.
The article was primarily intended to illustrate how economic alignment may very well be an additional area of alignment and risk that that we should more seriously consider. If you disagree with this, I sincerely want to better understand objections so I’d welcome a thoughtful counter argument that addresses the claims and not the structure of the article.
I don’t agree that associating multiple related ideas is necessarily ‘not good’, that said Governance and politics are not the focus of this article. In fact it specifically addresses that.
The article was primarily intended to illustrate how economic alignment may very well be an additional area of alignment and risk that that we should more seriously consider. If you disagree with this, I sincerely want to better understand objections so I’d welcome a thoughtful counter argument that addresses the claims and not the structure of the article.