My point is that: It’s not obvious that Solomonoff induction actually yeilds that dilemma. If it does, then this would be a good reason to reject it.
My point is that:
It’s not obvious that Solomonoff induction actually yeilds that dilemma. If it does, then this would be a good reason to reject it.
And my point is that:
It seems like it should; the article explicitly asks the reader to try and disprove this.
That’s kinda the point of the article.
It appears we all agree. I think.
And my point is that:
It seems like it should; the article explicitly asks the reader to try and disprove this.
That’s kinda the point of the article.
It appears we all agree. I think.