So if I may take the implication: you don’t take the SA seriously because . . it seems memetically similar to ideas espoused or held by agents you deem irrational?
I though it was clear from the previous discussion that the reason was pretty weak testability of simulationism, rather than ad hominem reasoning.
I though it was clear from the previous discussion that the reason was pretty weak testability of simulationism, rather than ad hominem reasoning.