I like those name suggestions. As far as 50,000 people, we could try to get a firm answer from Jim about how many people it would take. You’re certainly welcome to email him and/or Craig and ask. craig@craigslist.org and jim@craigslist.org
Wait. Steven0461 points out that which firm answer we get, if we do manage to get one, might depend on framing. It may be better to think through the email first.
I agree, I’d downmod myself, but the morale of a community activism effort is very important and I didn’t want to squander the energy people had to go and do something. I’m glad to see people are still excited...
I agree, I’d downmod myself, but the morale of a community activism effort is very important and I didn’t want to squander the energy people had to go and do something. I’m glad to see people are still excited...
I like those name suggestions. As far as 50,000 people, we could try to get a firm answer from Jim about how many people it would take. You’re certainly welcome to email him and/or Craig and ask. craig@craigslist.org and jim@craigslist.org
Wait. Steven0461 points out that which firm answer we get, if we do manage to get one, might depend on framing. It may be better to think through the email first.
Yes, wait.
I agree, I’d downmod myself, but the morale of a community activism effort is very important and I didn’t want to squander the energy people had to go and do something. I’m glad to see people are still excited...
I agree, I’d downmod myself, but the morale of a community activism effort is very important and I didn’t want to squander the energy people had to go and do something. I’m glad to see people are still excited...
Spamming these folk with a bunch of uncoordinated emails at this stage seems like a big risk to the idea for little benefit.