Short summary: They replicated the experiment but got no praseodymium. Undeterred, they received some samples from MHI, which also came up empty. Finally they went on site—and the only time they were able to observe praseodymium was when MHI researchers retrieved the samples and they were analyzed on-site. They also observed environmental praseodymium contamination.
We don’t have anything for the Toyota replication of the experiment, unfortunately.
the theory of the magic tweezer look more like a conspiracy-style claim...
more stange it seems that that US team bashed the result, claimed contamination of the lab, that strangely does not contaminate the blank samples…
more that that, the contamination have been checked by another team and they found nothing...
some conspiracy lover, and some business experts, just think about a manipulation to bash a competitor...
abyway Iwamura is not the bes evdence, there are tritium evidence in US and at BARC, He4/heat correlation at ENEA, and what I love the most is the ENEA paper at ICCF15 that show that cristallography structure of the surface determinate the probability of anomalous heat...
There’s a rather unprofessional PDF put together by a team at the Naval Research Center which disputes the significance of Iwamura’s findings:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GrabowskiKevaluation.pdf
Short summary: They replicated the experiment but got no praseodymium. Undeterred, they received some samples from MHI, which also came up empty. Finally they went on site—and the only time they were able to observe praseodymium was when MHI researchers retrieved the samples and they were analyzed on-site. They also observed environmental praseodymium contamination.
We don’t have anything for the Toyota replication of the experiment, unfortunately.
Interesting. See, this is the kind of thing I was looking for.
Yeah. I’m disappointed. I was excited by the possibility and went looking for replications; instead I found that.
note that there have been answers to those claims http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/35/SR35905nrl2009.shtml
the theory of the magic tweezer look more like a conspiracy-style claim...
more stange it seems that that US team bashed the result, claimed contamination of the lab, that strangely does not contaminate the blank samples… more that that, the contamination have been checked by another team and they found nothing...
some conspiracy lover, and some business experts, just think about a manipulation to bash a competitor...
abyway Iwamura is not the bes evdence, there are tritium evidence in US and at BARC, He4/heat correlation at ENEA, and what I love the most is the ENEA paper at ICCF15 that show that cristallography structure of the surface determinate the probability of anomalous heat...
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?616-ENEA-paper-ICCF15-(2009)-Cristallography-conditions&highlight=enea+cristallography