You seem to be correct about Swartz, sorry. I was confusing him with Peter Hagelstein. I should probably just remove the MIT references—I think the video stands well on its own.
Edit: also, yes, I admit the websites do not look great. Points against for sure. The data is pretty convincing though.
You seem to be correct about Swartz, sorry. I was confusing him with Peter Hagelstein. I should probably just remove the MIT references—I think the video stands well on its own.
Edit: also, yes, I admit the websites do not look great. Points against for sure. The data is pretty convincing though.
I took one look at that linked page and concluded that any data linked from it is more likely to be falsified than interesting. Your mileage may vary.