That theory is clearly explaining why LENr is rejected. In such transition the old-school community choose the evidence that “are acceptable” so thet their position stay winning. IT IS IMPOSSIBLe TO CONVINCE WITH EVIDENCES. thait is a conclusion of Thosma Kuhn.
At minimum as a matter of signaling, this is at best not a great way of being taken seriously. Poor use of spelling, strange capitalization, and invocation of Kuhn are already putting one high on the crackpot index. This isn’t an argument that anything you’ve said is wrong, but a matter of something you may want to be more aware of.
At a more substantial level, it may be worth noting that Kuhn didn’t say what you seem to think he said. You may want to go and read his book “The Structure of Scientific Revolution” which discusses a much more subtle notion of paradigm shifts than is generally portrayed.
the only way is through a global theory, that encompass all the physics.
What does this mean?
I’m curious though, if you are so sure that cold fusion’s acceptance is a matter of time, would you be willing to make a long term bet, possibly using Long Bets?
At minimum as a matter of signaling, this is at best not a great way of being taken seriously. Poor use of spelling, strange capitalization, and invocation of Kuhn are already putting one high on the crackpot index. This isn’t an argument that anything you’ve said is wrong, but a matter of something you may want to be more aware of.
At a more substantial level, it may be worth noting that Kuhn didn’t say what you seem to think he said. You may want to go and read his book “The Structure of Scientific Revolution” which discusses a much more subtle notion of paradigm shifts than is generally portrayed.
What does this mean?
I’m curious though, if you are so sure that cold fusion’s acceptance is a matter of time, would you be willing to make a long term bet, possibly using Long Bets?