I downvoted this because I want less content on this subject on this site—I’m here for the AI, philosophy, and psychology, and have made my truce with the people who want to talk about lifehacks all the time. I think politics, even meta-level politics, is a better fit for /r/slatestarcodex or the SSC comments, where there’s already herds of people who want to talk about politics all the time.
If you didn’t think it was a helpful post, I’m fine with you downvoting it, but I don’t think you should be downvoting posts on people’s personal blog just because you don’t like politics. My understanding was that politics was fine, but not on the front page. If you don’t want politics on people’s blogs I would suggest posting on meta arguing against people posting politics on their blogs or contacting the mods directly.
I think this is an understandable position, but it seems to me that most active users are looking at the daily posts, and the front page isn’t particularly priveleged. I don’t think there are any firm norms about politics at the moment either, only the aggregate of peoples’ opinions.
Well, if you’re downvoting all political posts, maybe I should upvote all non-frontpage political posts to counter this? All I’m saying is that a discussion on meta seems to be a better way of handling this than a upvote/downvote war.
I downvoted this because I want less content on this subject on this site—I’m here for the AI, philosophy, and psychology, and have made my truce with the people who want to talk about lifehacks all the time. I think politics, even meta-level politics, is a better fit for /r/slatestarcodex or the SSC comments, where there’s already herds of people who want to talk about politics all the time.
If you didn’t think it was a helpful post, I’m fine with you downvoting it, but I don’t think you should be downvoting posts on people’s personal blog just because you don’t like politics. My understanding was that politics was fine, but not on the front page. If you don’t want politics on people’s blogs I would suggest posting on meta arguing against people posting politics on their blogs or contacting the mods directly.
I think this is an understandable position, but it seems to me that most active users are looking at the daily posts, and the front page isn’t particularly priveleged. I don’t think there are any firm norms about politics at the moment either, only the aggregate of peoples’ opinions.
Well, if you’re downvoting all political posts, maybe I should upvote all non-frontpage political posts to counter this? All I’m saying is that a discussion on meta seems to be a better way of handling this than a upvote/downvote war.
Posts on the frontpage get about a factor of ~2x more views (eyeballing from our internal view numbers), and posts in curated get about 5x more views.
Is that controlled for the number of upvotes?
Neat, thanks!