However, the Self-Indication Assumption has a number of such implications, e.g. that if we non-indexically assign any finite positive prior probability to the world containing infinitely many observers like us then post-SIA we must believe that this is true with probability 1.
Probability 1?!? Hang on—how confident was the assigning of probabilities to an infinite number of observers in the fist place? I don’t think this is a blemish on the Self-Indication Assumption—the conclusion is more not to mess about idly with infinity.
Probability 1?!? Hang on—how confident was the assigning of probabilities to an infinite number of observers in the fist place? I don’t think this is a blemish on the Self-Indication Assumption—the conclusion is more not to mess about idly with infinity.