I don’t think you’d see such a correlation yet. As soon as these ‘scientists’ sound the ‘low carb’ == ‘evolutionism’ alarm, you may see a swift realignment from the creationist populace.
Oh, but the truth of the matter is irrelevant. It may be true, or it may be false, but as soon as the faithful get wind of the ‘evolutionism’ connection, they will certainly take the opposite side, just to be sure.
My point is that this will be sufficiently controversial among scientists that by the time it shows up on the creationists’ radar, the connection to ‘evolutionism’ won’t be obvious or clear cut.
I don’t think you’d see such a correlation yet. As soon as these ‘scientists’ sound the ‘low carb’ == ‘evolutionism’ alarm, you may see a swift realignment from the creationist populace.
I’m not so sure that would happen. Keep in mind evolutionary psychology is extremely controversial even among scientists who are atheists.
Oh, but the truth of the matter is irrelevant. It may be true, or it may be false, but as soon as the faithful get wind of the ‘evolutionism’ connection, they will certainly take the opposite side, just to be sure.
My point is that this will be sufficiently controversial among scientists that by the time it shows up on the creationists’ radar, the connection to ‘evolutionism’ won’t be obvious or clear cut.