Is it worth reading any historical narrative or biographical account if my aim is to improve my life in specific ways using that knowledge, if luck/survivor bias/outcome bias plays a huge part in whose life is memorialised this way?
I’ll provide an example to make it clear—will reading a biography of Abraham Lincoln actually improve me in a specific way, like providing me a model for leadership, or way to handle people, or is his success based on his principles just context dependent, or the result of luck?
What I have observed: I have read the biographies of Steve Jobs, Napoleon, and Julius Caesar, and I haven’t found any improvement in me, nor did I get specific insights into aspects of life, with one exception—my mindset changed to become more ambitious.
gwern (IDK if /u/gwern works here) - you have read a lot of nonfiction of this type—hell, you have recently read the Quincey autobiography. What do you think?
Standard followup to all such “is it worth X” questions: compared to what? What’s your opportunity cost of reading such books? More valuable than Call of Duty? than Harry Potter? Than watching football? I’d say probably so, if you need to ask the question. More valuable than learning a new language, bonding with friends/family, or conquering an enemy? Probably not.
I’ve read a fair few, and I think the primary rationality benefit I get is temporal perspective. Really incorporating the belief that real people made real decisions decades, centuries, and millenia ago into my life has been a change (note: not clear that it’s a beneficial change, as I’m a lot less inclined to think that very much of my experience will actually matter in 1000 years). I also get some status and interpersonal interaction benefits by being known as “well read” and able to cite some of the statements and events in such books.
If I’m honest, though, I wouldn’t read them if they weren’t entertaining and enjoyable.
Well, this probably won’t help much, but my preferred source is a totally fictional narrative—Dumas’s Twenty years after. I find comfort in how it treats personal ambition, rivalry, motivation nuances (“for old times’ sake”/”for honour”/”for fame”/”for money”/”for family”...) without explicit judgement; I re-read it in early 2014, to ease myself into the thought that the political situation [in Kyiv] would likely get worse (and you probably can’t imagine how we wished that there would be no lives lost); and last but not least, I have, for personal reasons, largely fallen out of touch with some of my dear friends, and this novel gives me hope that I might be able to love them just as truly even decades later. I think it is worth reading.
I would also recommend Daniel Granin’s “Bison”, which is a biography of N. Timofeyev-Resovsky, or in the author’s words, “a book on honour and dishonour”.
I don’t really see how this could be helpful. The biographer would have to be able to discern which qualities made the person successful and translate them into actionable specifics. In practice, it’s pretty hard for highly successful people to explain their own success in an actionable way even when they seem to be sincerely trying (e.g. Warren Buffet.)
To readers -
Is it worth reading any historical narrative or biographical account if my aim is to improve my life in specific ways using that knowledge, if luck/survivor bias/outcome bias plays a huge part in whose life is memorialised this way?
I’ll provide an example to make it clear—will reading a biography of Abraham Lincoln actually improve me in a specific way, like providing me a model for leadership, or way to handle people, or is his success based on his principles just context dependent, or the result of luck?
What I have observed: I have read the biographies of Steve Jobs, Napoleon, and Julius Caesar, and I haven’t found any improvement in me, nor did I get specific insights into aspects of life, with one exception—my mindset changed to become more ambitious.
gwern (IDK if /u/gwern works here) - you have read a lot of nonfiction of this type—hell, you have recently read the Quincey autobiography. What do you think?
Standard followup to all such “is it worth X” questions: compared to what? What’s your opportunity cost of reading such books? More valuable than Call of Duty? than Harry Potter? Than watching football? I’d say probably so, if you need to ask the question. More valuable than learning a new language, bonding with friends/family, or conquering an enemy? Probably not.
I’ve read a fair few, and I think the primary rationality benefit I get is temporal perspective. Really incorporating the belief that real people made real decisions decades, centuries, and millenia ago into my life has been a change (note: not clear that it’s a beneficial change, as I’m a lot less inclined to think that very much of my experience will actually matter in 1000 years). I also get some status and interpersonal interaction benefits by being known as “well read” and able to cite some of the statements and events in such books.
If I’m honest, though, I wouldn’t read them if they weren’t entertaining and enjoyable.
Well, this probably won’t help much, but my preferred source is a totally fictional narrative—Dumas’s Twenty years after. I find comfort in how it treats personal ambition, rivalry, motivation nuances (“for old times’ sake”/”for honour”/”for fame”/”for money”/”for family”...) without explicit judgement; I re-read it in early 2014, to ease myself into the thought that the political situation [in Kyiv] would likely get worse (and you probably can’t imagine how we wished that there would be no lives lost); and last but not least, I have, for personal reasons, largely fallen out of touch with some of my dear friends, and this novel gives me hope that I might be able to love them just as truly even decades later. I think it is worth reading.
I would also recommend Daniel Granin’s “Bison”, which is a biography of N. Timofeyev-Resovsky, or in the author’s words, “a book on honour and dishonour”.
I don’t really see how this could be helpful. The biographer would have to be able to discern which qualities made the person successful and translate them into actionable specifics. In practice, it’s pretty hard for highly successful people to explain their own success in an actionable way even when they seem to be sincerely trying (e.g. Warren Buffet.)