Does it make sense to do the “this is what the world would look like if our sampling methodologies were the same” calculation when you have strong reasons to suspect that the sampling methodologies are not the same?
The calculation is more to convince members of the rationalist community that you need extremely strong evidence to believe that rationalist Trump voters thought Trump was racist. Assuming differing sampling methodologies would strengthen the result beyond the 2.6 SEs that Lumifer calculated.
Thanks!
Does it make sense to do the “this is what the world would look like if our sampling methodologies were the same” calculation when you have strong reasons to suspect that the sampling methodologies are not the same?
The calculation is more to convince members of the rationalist community that you need extremely strong evidence to believe that rationalist Trump voters thought Trump was racist. Assuming differing sampling methodologies would strengthen the result beyond the 2.6 SEs that Lumifer calculated.