Apparently it’s a third option—most don’t actually exist!
https://www.mashable.com/2017/11/17/china-binhai-library
Oh, that’s a bit disappointing. I’ll put that in the “just for aesthetics” bucket, then. To me, that makes this feel less like “rationalist art”, though I’m not sure how fair that is.
Apparently it’s a third option—most don’t actually exist!
https://www.mashable.com/2017/11/17/china-binhai-library
Oh, that’s a bit disappointing. I’ll put that in the “just for aesthetics” bucket, then. To me, that makes this feel less like “rationalist art”, though I’m not sure how fair that is.