Disagreement doesn’t prevent Wikipedia from having one website on every topic. You just need some process of finding consensus. Plenty of people don’t like the consensus that Wikipedia finds, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t useful output.
If we have an important topic like Supervulcano defense, few people have any idea about what to do about it and disagree. However if we had the draft legislation, it would be quite useful to pull it out in a time like this where we suddenly have the public more concerned with the risk of catastrophes.
There are plenty of different ways to create “consensus”. You could have a process that looks like github where every project has a maintainer and if someone disagrees with the maintainer, they can fork.
Disagreement doesn’t prevent Wikipedia from having one website on every topic. You just need some process of finding consensus. Plenty of people don’t like the consensus that Wikipedia finds, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t useful output.
If we have an important topic like Supervulcano defense, few people have any idea about what to do about it and disagree. However if we had the draft legislation, it would be quite useful to pull it out in a time like this where we suddenly have the public more concerned with the risk of catastrophes.
There are plenty of different ways to create “consensus”. You could have a process that looks like github where every project has a maintainer and if someone disagrees with the maintainer, they can fork.