Yes, I agree that the universe can be simulated (or, more precisely, my guess is that it can be, the available scientific evidence suggests that it probably can be, and it’s a convenient working hypothesis).
I’m afraid I don’t at all understand your argument here. “If G(TM) outputs P, then it would never output P2 and vice versa”—I have no inkling why that should be true. Why do you believe that G(TM) cannot output both of them on different occasions?
(Sorry about the long delay in replying.)
Yes, I agree that the universe can be simulated (or, more precisely, my guess is that it can be, the available scientific evidence suggests that it probably can be, and it’s a convenient working hypothesis).
I’m afraid I don’t at all understand your argument here. “If G(TM) outputs P, then it would never output P2 and vice versa”—I have no inkling why that should be true. Why do you believe that G(TM) cannot output both of them on different occasions?