Less so, but it just leads to the question of “why do you think it’s suspicious?”. If at all possible I’d prefer just engaging with whether the root claim is true or false.
That’s fair. I initially looked at (the root claim) as a very different move, which could use critique on different grounds.
‘Yet another group of people thinks they are immune to common bias. At 11, we will return to see if they, shockingly, walked right into it. When will people (who clearly aren’t immune) going to stop doing this?’
Do you have the same reaction to:
“This claim is suscpicious.”
Less so, but it just leads to the question of “why do you think it’s suspicious?”. If at all possible I’d prefer just engaging with whether the root claim is true or false.
That’s fair. I initially looked at (the root claim) as a very different move, which could use critique on different grounds.
‘Yet another group of people thinks they are immune to common bias. At 11, we will return to see if they, shockingly, walked right into it. When will people (who clearly aren’t immune) going to stop doing this?’