It seems better to consolidate these posts into bibliography posts by subject, perhaps updating the old posts. The single-paper posts clog Discussion too much.
ETA: on further consideration, I hold this view less strongly.
I don’t see a problem with someone saying (implicitly) “hey, I spotted this paper I found interesting on this topic of local interest” and don’t see it as “clogging” Discussion.
There’s a difference between one person posting one thing, and one person posting many over a short period. The latter person can reduce congestion without reducing the information conveyed by consolidation.
I feel that it’s better to err on the side of posting too much rather than posting too little. High posting frequency is probably the number one thing that a blog-based community needs to stay alive. (Quality is also important, but that is hardly an issue in Luke’s case.)
It seems better to consolidate these posts into bibliography posts by subject, perhaps updating the old posts. The single-paper posts clog Discussion too much.
ETA: on further consideration, I hold this view less strongly.
I feel slightly more motivated to read these papers if they’re presented one at a time.
I don’t see a problem with someone saying (implicitly) “hey, I spotted this paper I found interesting on this topic of local interest” and don’t see it as “clogging” Discussion.
There’s a difference between one person posting one thing, and one person posting many over a short period. The latter person can reduce congestion without reducing the information conveyed by consolidation.
I feel that it’s better to err on the side of posting too much rather than posting too little. High posting frequency is probably the number one thing that a blog-based community needs to stay alive. (Quality is also important, but that is hardly an issue in Luke’s case.)