Au contraire, I think that “mutual information between the object and the environment” is basically the right definition of “knowledge”, at least for knowledge about the world
I think knowledge as a whole cannot be absent, but knowledge of a particular fact can definitely be absent (if there’s no relationship between the thing-of-discourse and the fact).
Then how can it ever be absent?
I think knowledge as a whole cannot be absent, but knowledge of a particular fact can definitely be absent (if there’s no relationship between the thing-of-discourse and the fact).
So rocks have non zero knowledge?