CarlShulman comments on [Retracted] Simpson’s paradox strikes again: there is no great stagnation?

CarlShulman 30 Jul 2012 22:01 UTC
0 points
No, I got it from Henderson’s blog, but the source data got lost and reconstructed as Tyler. I haven’t seen any Marginal Revolution post publicizing it.
- gwern 30 Jul 2012 22:09 UTC
  0 points
  Parent
  Whoops, you’re right; it was Henderson/EconLog, not Cowen.