You don’t pluck them from their families, because you can’t do this in the US or Europe anyway. You build the schools in the other countries. You’re not going to send them to Harvard. The point is not to get them hooked into the US old-boy network so they can win grants or get venture capital or work for Goldman-Sachs. The point is to get them an education, which is not what top-tier US schools are for anyway.
In the US, I think the law prevents you from doing this, unless you’re the military.
Well, if it’s for-profit venture, then the point isn’t to get them an education, the point is to prepare them for lucrative careers, in which case social capital is of high importance.
You don’t pluck them from their families, because you can’t do this in the US or Europe anyway. You build the schools in the other countries. You’re not going to send them to Harvard. The point is not to get them hooked into the US old-boy network so they can win grants or get venture capital or work for Goldman-Sachs. The point is to get them an education, which is not what top-tier US schools are for anyway.
In the US, I think the law prevents you from doing this, unless you’re the military.
Well, if it’s for-profit venture, then the point isn’t to get them an education, the point is to prepare them for lucrative careers, in which case social capital is of high importance.
I propose a new term for what we’re trying to do here, not for-profit, nor not-for-profit, but for-results.