As is often the case I did enjoy reading your post. They are always well presented and interesting.
I’m not sure if you had this view in mind while writing, but in many ways I read this as a very good approach to the practical application of Occam’s Razor. Things need to be kept as simple as they can while still shedding light on the underlying question at hand. I think your post helps to consider just how, when and where one might simplify in our models/maps.
As is often the case I did enjoy reading your post. They are always well presented and interesting.
I’m not sure if you had this view in mind while writing, but in many ways I read this as a very good approach to the practical application of Occam’s Razor. Things need to be kept as simple as they can while still shedding light on the underlying question at hand. I think your post helps to consider just how, when and where one might simplify in our models/maps.
Interesting connection, I hadn’t thought about it from the Occam’s razor angle. That’s also similar to the maps <-> abstraction connection.