I don’t quite understand the formal structure behind your informal argument. If the decision of a group decider is 1/9th as important, does this also invalidate the reasoning that “yea” → 550 in the first case? If no, why?
I don’t quite understand the formal structure behind your informal argument. If the decision of a group decider is 1/9th as important, does this also invalidate the reasoning that “yea” → 550 in the first case? If no, why?