It is a matter of simple correctness
What information I learnt from Ben’s answer:
There is an experimental AGI project doing research towards a postive Singularity.
An AGI researcher believes $100K are better spend with that project.
What I concluded:
There are other options to work towards a positive Singularity (experimental).
The SIAI might benefit from cooperating with them rather than competing.
Now you and other tell me those conclusions are incorrect. Can you elaborate?
Now you and other tell me those conclusions are incorrect.
No, I didn’t. In fact for the purposes of the comment you are replying to I clearly and explicitly assumed them to be true for the purposes of the argument.
What information I learnt from Ben’s answer:
There is an experimental AGI project doing research towards a postive Singularity.
An AGI researcher believes $100K are better spend with that project.
What I concluded:
There are other options to work towards a positive Singularity (experimental).
The SIAI might benefit from cooperating with them rather than competing.
Now you and other tell me those conclusions are incorrect. Can you elaborate?
No, I didn’t. In fact for the purposes of the comment you are replying to I clearly and explicitly assumed them to be true for the purposes of the argument.