It becomes harder to form a good ending. You can’t just delete that line without substituting another ending.
My main complaint was that I just couldn’t tell what you were trying to say with the current ending. If you’re open to suggestions, I’d replace the last few lines with something like this instead:
If this analysis is correct, it suggests that we should avoid using asymmetric mental point systems except where structurally necessary. For example, the next time you’re in situation …, consider doing … instead of …
ETA:
If we can’t put an incidental/payoff call to implied action into an analysis piece, then the concrete steps this suggests won’t get taken. People might think ‘this is interesting’ but not know what to do with it, and thus discard the presented model as unworthy of their brain space.
It’s not clear to me whether you’re saying A) people ought to keep this model in their brain even if there was no practical implication, but they won’t in practice, so you had to give them one, or B) it’s reasonable to demand a practical implication before making space for a model in one’s brain which is why you included one in the post. If the latter, it seems like the practical implication / call to action shouldn’t just be incidental, but significant space should be devoted to spelling it out clearly and backing it up by analysis/argument, so that if it was wrong it could be critiqued (which would allow people to discard the model after all).
My main complaint was that I just couldn’t tell what you were trying to say with the current ending. If you’re open to suggestions, I’d replace the last few lines with something like this instead:
If this analysis is correct, it suggests that we should avoid using asymmetric mental point systems except where structurally necessary. For example, the next time you’re in situation …, consider doing … instead of …
ETA:
It’s not clear to me whether you’re saying A) people ought to keep this model in their brain even if there was no practical implication, but they won’t in practice, so you had to give them one, or B) it’s reasonable to demand a practical implication before making space for a model in one’s brain which is why you included one in the post. If the latter, it seems like the practical implication / call to action shouldn’t just be incidental, but significant space should be devoted to spelling it out clearly and backing it up by analysis/argument, so that if it was wrong it could be critiqued (which would allow people to discard the model after all).