I actually see this in my parent; when relating to their parent. My parent still talks to their parent regularly, a lifetime ~45+ years of critical treatment later.
There are two concerns:
The world is a darker place with no parent at all. The day they are gone; is the day you wished you asked them for their advice on something more. (or that seems to be the sentiment from many)
you need to prioritise your happiness. The parent (while being their own person) wants the best for you. Unfortunately that might mean what is not best for that parent.
I’d like to congratulate you for noticing the problem and identifying it. This step was not easy; but by doing so you make things entirely better from here on in.
I believe there are several good solutions to this problem and several more mediocre or bad solutions.
With puzzles that I personally encounter that involve the different perspectives of different people (which I find this problem to be—your perspective VS your parent’s perspective); I find that they can sometimes be solved by folding the puzzle in on themselves. i.e. ask the person of problem (parent) to solve the puzzle for you by clearly sharing the perspective (sometimes via Socratic questioning). You are inside the problem but you can step outside and attack the problem from outside. (its not easy; but I offer my suggestion for you to try).
A technique I would suggest for approaching the problem head on (if you choose to). Develop a spreadsheet, of interactions with the person. consider adding;
Date, time
Subject of the interaction
Either a rating of the interaction (1-10) or a simple scale (positive, negative, neutral)
To do this is to generate evidence. With evidence you can pre-commit to an action given certain evidential findings. i.e. move far away if you find a 10 negative to 1 positive or worse ratio. The second benefit of evidence is it can assist in (as above) folding the problem on itself. By showing an entirely valid perspective, evidence cannot be discounted in the same way an opinion can be (I said, you said, they said, etc evidence).
I would give some weight to a middle-solution. Limited contact (although that may mean you get one day a month of hell-by-critical-parent),
I believe this is a hurdle we must face; overcoming the situations we are burdened by our parents.
Good luck! (happy to add more if you want more clarity on these suggestions)
I actually see this in my parent; when relating to their parent. My parent still talks to their parent regularly, a lifetime ~45+ years of critical treatment later.
There are two concerns:
The world is a darker place with no parent at all. The day they are gone; is the day you wished you asked them for their advice on something more. (or that seems to be the sentiment from many)
you need to prioritise your happiness. The parent (while being their own person) wants the best for you. Unfortunately that might mean what is not best for that parent.
I’d like to congratulate you for noticing the problem and identifying it. This step was not easy; but by doing so you make things entirely better from here on in.
I believe there are several good solutions to this problem and several more mediocre or bad solutions.
With puzzles that I personally encounter that involve the different perspectives of different people (which I find this problem to be—your perspective VS your parent’s perspective); I find that they can sometimes be solved by folding the puzzle in on themselves. i.e. ask the person of problem (parent) to solve the puzzle for you by clearly sharing the perspective (sometimes via Socratic questioning). You are inside the problem but you can step outside and attack the problem from outside. (its not easy; but I offer my suggestion for you to try).
A technique I would suggest for approaching the problem head on (if you choose to). Develop a spreadsheet, of interactions with the person. consider adding;
Date, time
Subject of the interaction
Either a rating of the interaction (1-10) or a simple scale (positive, negative, neutral)
To do this is to generate evidence. With evidence you can pre-commit to an action given certain evidential findings. i.e. move far away if you find a 10 negative to 1 positive or worse ratio. The second benefit of evidence is it can assist in (as above) folding the problem on itself. By showing an entirely valid perspective, evidence cannot be discounted in the same way an opinion can be (I said, you said, they said, etc evidence).
I would give some weight to a middle-solution. Limited contact (although that may mean you get one day a month of hell-by-critical-parent),
I believe this is a hurdle we must face; overcoming the situations we are burdened by our parents.
Good luck! (happy to add more if you want more clarity on these suggestions)