If steelmaning in is to take the presumed weak idea to be refuted as serious as one can, the Sagan / Velikovski debate is instructional in general and the Talk Origins site is instructional in particular.
Where did you read the debate and what did you learn from it? Most coverage I find is pretty negative about Sagan.
If steelmaning in is to take the presumed weak idea to be refuted as serious as one can, the Sagan / Velikovski debate is instructional in general and the Talk Origins site is instructional in particular.
Where did you read the debate and what did you learn from it? Most coverage I find is pretty negative about Sagan.