I think this gets a LOT simpler and more straightforward when you use weights rather than binary imperatives. You could model this as importance compared to all other things, or as uncertainty about “ought-ness” of an action.
If you’re 95% ought to do A and 95% ought to do B, you’re 90% ought to do A and B (assuming A and B are independent actions. Different calculations apply if they’re correlated somehow).
I think this gets a LOT simpler and more straightforward when you use weights rather than binary imperatives. You could model this as importance compared to all other things, or as uncertainty about “ought-ness” of an action.
If you’re 95% ought to do A and 95% ought to do B, you’re 90% ought to do A and B (assuming A and B are independent actions. Different calculations apply if they’re correlated somehow).