I think Proposition 1 is false as stated because the resulting functional
f+:M±(X)⊕R→R is not always continuous (wrt the KR-metric).
The function f:[0,1]→[0,1], x↦x1/3 with X=[0,1] should be a counterexample.
However, the non-continuous functional f+ should still be continuous on the set of sa-measures.
Another thing: the space of measures M±(X) is claimed to be a Banach space with the KR-norm (in the notation section).
Afaik this is not true, while the space is a Banach space with the TV-norm, with the KR-metric/norm it should not be complete and is merely a normed vector space.
Also the claim (in “Basic concepts”) that M±(X) is the dual space of C(X) is only true if equipped with TV-norm, not with KR-metric.
Another nitpick: in Theorem 5, the type of h in the assumption is probably meant to be C(X)→R∪{−∞}, instead of C(X)→R.
I think Proposition 1 is false as stated because the resulting functional f+:M±(X)⊕R→R is not always continuous (wrt the KR-metric). The function f:[0,1]→[0,1], x↦x1/3 with X=[0,1] should be a counterexample. However, the non-continuous functional f+ should still be continuous on the set of sa-measures.
Another thing: the space of measures M±(X) is claimed to be a Banach space with the KR-norm (in the notation section). Afaik this is not true, while the space is a Banach space with the TV-norm, with the KR-metric/norm it should not be complete and is merely a normed vector space. Also the claim (in “Basic concepts”) that M±(X) is the dual space of C(X) is only true if equipped with TV-norm, not with KR-metric.
Another nitpick: in Theorem 5, the type of h in the assumption is probably meant to be C(X)→R∪{−∞}, instead of C(X)→R.