Thin-slicing works well for judging Big Five. A paper just came out on detecting Big Five by correlation to choice of shoes, for example.
Unfortunately, the article in question (by Gillath et al) is expensively paywalled.
From this lack of Openness (ha ha) I predict that the article won’t begin with the opening line of R.E.M.’s “Good Advices”.
You can get the ‘author’s version’ of the paper ‘for personal use, not redistribution’ by going to this website, and providing your email ID:
http://web.ku.edu/~gillab/pubs.html
Hmm.. Not sure about the etiquette of posting the link in a public forum since it’s not meant for redistribution, but will keep it for now.
No, it’s not. I know I read it without going through my academic proxy; following a link on Marginal Revolution, IIRC.
Thin-slicing works well for judging Big Five. A paper just came out on detecting Big Five by correlation to choice of shoes, for example.
Unfortunately, the article in question (by Gillath et al) is expensively paywalled.
From this lack of Openness (ha ha) I predict that the article won’t begin with the opening line of R.E.M.’s “Good Advices”.
You can get the ‘author’s version’ of the paper ‘for personal use, not redistribution’ by going to this website, and providing your email ID:
http://web.ku.edu/~gillab/pubs.html
Hmm.. Not sure about the etiquette of posting the link in a public forum since it’s not meant for redistribution, but will keep it for now.
No, it’s not. I know I read it without going through my academic proxy; following a link on Marginal Revolution, IIRC.