Signer comments on Ackshually, many worlds is wrong

Signer 12 Apr 2024 10:57 UTC
1 point
0
1. such formalisms are unwieldy
Do you actually need any other reason to not believe in True Randomness?
1. that’s just passing the buck to the one who interprets the formalism
Any argument is just passing the buck to the one who interprets the language.
- tailcalled 12 Apr 2024 13:43 UTC
  2 points
  0
  Parent
  
  Do you actually need any other reason to not believe in True Randomness?
  
  I think I used to accept this argument, but then came to believe that simplicity of formalisms usually originates from renormalization more than from the simplicity being Literally True?