Ah, thanks. I’ve already replied to that by now, but we’re still haggling over the details. I assume you were referring to this paragraph?
If I try to answer that question generally, I get “Everything that exists, exists as a consequence of the way everything that existed a moment earlier existed, and all of that stuff existed as a consequence of the way everything existed a moment before that, and so on and so on.” Which is unsatisfyingly general, as expected, but accurate enough. (Or, to quote Lorraine Hansberry: “Things as they are are as they are and have been and will be that way because they got that way because things were as they were in the first place!”)
Ah, thanks. I’ve already replied to that by now, but we’re still haggling over the details. I assume you were referring to this paragraph?
That paragraph and the one after it, yeah. But as you say, you’ve already replied to it. I’ll probably post a reply to your reply in a bit.