Hi. I found the paper containing the example in question—it’s Bayesians sometimes cannot ignore even very implausible theories. I don’t understand everything in the paper, but it seems like they’ve anticipated your objection and have another example which explicitly includes a “Something else” case.
Hi. I found the paper containing the example in question—it’s Bayesians sometimes cannot ignore even very implausible theories. I don’t understand everything in the paper, but it seems like they’ve anticipated your objection and have another example which explicitly includes a “Something else” case.