I haven’t particularly run across any philosophy explicitly making the connection from the correspondence theory of truth to “There are causal processes producing map-territory correspondences” to “You have to look at things in order to draw accurate maps of them, and this is a general rule with no exception for special interest groups who want more forgiving treatment for their assertions”. I would not be surprised to find out it existed, especially on the second clause.
Process reliabilism maybe? Defines the “justified” part in “justified true belief” as the belief being formed by a reliable truth-producing process.
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article:
Alvin Goldman offered his first formulation of a reliable process theory of knowing — as a refinement of the causal theory of knowing — in a short paper on innate knowledge (Goldman, 1975).
Whatever a “causal theory of knowing” is. But it sounds like the kind of thing you’re talking about.
Process reliabilism maybe? Defines the “justified” part in “justified true belief” as the belief being formed by a reliable truth-producing process.
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article:
Whatever a “causal theory of knowing” is. But it sounds like the kind of thing you’re talking about.