Surely this argument can be made for providing money to charities as well. In which case, the question is which is better:
1.) A small increase in the number of beggars. 2.) All current and future beggars receiving no aid—a possibility which has multiple problems.
Or am I missing something?
Surely this argument can be made for providing money to charities as well. In which case, the question is which is better:
1.) A small increase in the number of beggars. 2.) All current and future beggars receiving no aid—a possibility which has multiple problems.
Or am I missing something?