Follow-up: excellent new material from SB, who provide concrete research avenue for proving physics allow more than what JC assumptions allow. However the most interesting part might be Jacob providing his best (imho) point for why we can’t reject his assumptions so easily.
So I observe the fact that human engineering and biology have ended up on the same pareto surface for interconnect space & energy efficiency—despite being mostly unrelated optimization processes using very different materials—as evidence of a hard pareto surface rather than being mere coincidence.
Very good point indeed, unless someone could explain this coincidence using cheaper assumptions.
Follow-up: excellent new material from SB, who provide concrete research avenue for proving physics allow more than what JC assumptions allow. However the most interesting part might be Jacob providing his best (imho) point for why we can’t reject his assumptions so easily.
Very good point indeed, unless someone could explain this coincidence using cheaper assumptions.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YihMH7M8bwYraGM8g/my-side-of-an-argument-with-jacob-cannell-about-chip