The TLDR is that he accuses Paul Bloom of really not having much data to support several of his claim, despite Paul claiming the data does defend them.
That said, my impression is that Paul Bloom is generally correct (Peter Singer and Sam Harris both gave positive reviews, but seemingly because the book is convenient for their views).
I found this post pretty useful. Thanks for collecting all the resources on the topic.
Small point: when looking into it, I would note that I found Simon Baron-Cohen’s review of Against Empathy to be interesting.
https://bostonreview.net/forum/against-empathy/simon-baron-cohen-response-against-empathy-baron-cohen
The TLDR is that he accuses Paul Bloom of really not having much data to support several of his claim, despite Paul claiming the data does defend them.
That said, my impression is that Paul Bloom is generally correct (Peter Singer and Sam Harris both gave positive reviews, but seemingly because the book is convenient for their views).